|No case of indelible ink smugglers|
|Beh Lih Yi | May 6, 08 1:17pm|
|The Election Commission's (EC) controversial decision to cancel the use of the indelible ink four days before the March 8 polls was based on hearsay evidence, the Dewan Rakyat was told today. |
This shocking revelation was made in a written parliamentary reply by Home Minister Syed Hamid Albar to Fong Po Kuan (DAP-Batu Gajah) today.
On March 4, the EC announced its last-minute decision to cancel the use of the indelible ink, long-demanded by polls reform groups to prevent electoral irregularities, citing public order and security issues.
The EC then had attributed the reasons to police reports alleging that certain quarters had purchased indelible ink from abroad with the intention of creating confusion and suspicion as to the status of voters.
However, according to the two-page parliamentary reply to the Batu Gajah MP today, the police investigation had found no evidence behind the claim after three investigation papers were opened.
"After the police reports were studied and interviews with the complainants and the witnesses, it is found that there was no evidence at all to show the ink was smuggled in from Thailand. This is because no witness has seen the ink (personally).
"From the witness statements, no individual, syndicate or any particular party was identified to be involved in this (ink smuggling). The complainant and witness' statement were based on hearsay and no individual was identified positively," Syed Hamid stated.
Investigation closed at AG's Chambers
With that, the minister added that the three investigation papers which were referred to the Attorney-General's Chambers on March 14 and 21 later were classified as "no further action".
Syed Hamid also noted that the complainants had lodged the police reports on the basis that they were worried the indelible ink can be purchased easily from Thailand and that it will be misused in the March 8 polls.
The indelible ink was to be introduced for the first time in Malaysia as part of efforts to enhance transparency.
In line with this, along with the introduction of the ink, the EC had also allowed for the casting of postal ballots to be observed by polling agents and the use of transparent ballot boxes.
In preparation for the use of the indelible ink, the EC had previously said that it would buy approximately 48,000 bottles of indelible ink worth RM2.4 million from India.
The EC believed that the changes would quell some of the allegations that Malaysian elections are not free and fair.
However, its decision to cancel the use of the ink subsequently drew flak numerous quarters, including those in the ruling parties, which expressed their outrage and disappointment.
Daripada Abu Umarah iaitu al-Bara' bin 'Azib radhiallahu anhuma, katanya: "Kita semua diperintah oleh Rasulullah s.a.w. untuk melakukan tujuh perkara, iaitu meninjau orang sakit, mengikuti janazah, menentasymitkan orang yang bersin, menolong orang yang lemah, membantu orang yang teraniaya, meratakan salam dan melaksanakan sumpah."